netdev - Re: [PATCH net 1/9] virtio-net: remove the warning before XDP linearizing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 23 Dec 2016 20:31:53 +0100
From:   Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To:     Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>, mst@...hat.com,
        virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
CC:     john.r.fastabend@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/9] virtio-net: remove the warning before XDP linearizing

Hi Jason,

On 12/23/2016 03:37 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
> Since we use EWMA to estimate the size of rx buffer. When rx buffer
> size is underestimated, it's usual to have a packet with more than one
> buffers. Consider this is not a bug, remove the warning and correct
> the comment before XDP linearizing.
>
> Cc: John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
> ---
>   drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 8 +-------
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> index 08327e0..1067253 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> @@ -552,14 +552,8 @@ static struct sk_buff *receive_mergeable(struct net_device *dev,
>   		struct page *xdp_page;
>   		u32 act;
>
> -		/* No known backend devices should send packets with
> -		 * more than a single buffer when XDP conditions are
> -		 * met. However it is not strictly illegal so the case
> -		 * is handled as an exception and a warning is thrown.
> -		 */
> +		/* This happens when rx buffer size is underestimated */
>   		if (unlikely(num_buf > 1)) {
> -			bpf_warn_invalid_xdp_buffer();

Could you also remove the bpf_warn_invalid_xdp_buffer(), which got added
just for this?

Thanks.

>   			/* linearize data for XDP */
>   			xdp_page = xdp_linearize_page(rq, num_buf,
>   						      page, offset, &len);
>