netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] net: dsa: select NET

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 9 Jan 2017 08:47:31 -0800
From:   Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To:     Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...oirfairelinux.com,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: dsa: select NET_SWITCHDEV

On 01/09/17 08:32, Vivien Didelot wrote:
> Hi Randy,
> 
> Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org> writes:
> 
>> On 01/08/17 17:18, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>>> On 01/08/2017 03:17 PM, Vivien Didelot wrote:
>>>> DSA wraps SWITCHDEV, thus select it instead of depending on it.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
>>>
>>
>> but when CONFIG_INET is not enabled, the patch causes this warning:
>>
>> warning: (NET_DSA) selects NET_SWITCHDEV which has unmet direct dependencies (NET && INET)
> 
> Thanks for spotting that! Would that be enough to change this first?
> 
>     diff --git a/net/dsa/Kconfig b/net/dsa/Kconfig
>     index 675acbf1502d..c7263b70e72b 100644
>     --- a/net/dsa/Kconfig
>     +++ b/net/dsa/Kconfig
>     @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
>     config HAVE_NET_DSA
>             def_bool y
>     -       depends on NETDEVICES && !S390
>     +       depends on INET && NETDEVICES && !S390
> 
>     # Drivers must select NET_DSA and the appropriate tagging format

Yes, thanks.

Tested-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>


-- 
~Randy