lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 9 Jan 2017 09:43:52 -0800
From:   Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To:     Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH 0/3] net: optimize ICMP-reply code path

On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 7:03 AM, Jesper Dangaard Brouer
<brouer@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> Use-case: The specific case I experienced this being a bottleneck is,
> sending UDP packets to a port with no listener, which obviously result
> in kernel replying with ICMP Destination Unreachable (type:3), Port
> Unreachable (code:3), which cause the bottleneck.

Why this is a case we should care about for performance?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ