netdev - [PATCH net] netvsc: add rcu_read locking to netvsc callback

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 10 Jan 2017 07:50:16 -0800
From:   Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
To:     davem@...emloft.net
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>
Subject: [PATCH net] netvsc: add rcu_read locking to netvsc callback

Lockdep finds a case where netvsc receive processing is incorrectly
assuming it is in RCU safe zone. The driver is using RCU to handle
VF reference but RCU read lock not held.

Fixes 0c9d3ba9a87b ("hv_netvsc: use RCU to protect vf_netdev")

Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>
---
 drivers/net/hyperv/netvsc_drv.c | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/net/hyperv/netvsc_drv.c b/drivers/net/hyperv/netvsc_drv.c
index c9414c054852..fcab8019dda0 100644
--- a/drivers/net/hyperv/netvsc_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/net/hyperv/netvsc_drv.c
@@ -659,6 +659,7 @@ int netvsc_recv_callback(struct hv_device *device_obj,
 	 * policy filters on the host). Deliver these via the VF
 	 * interface in the guest.
 	 */
+	rcu_read_lock();
 	vf_netdev = rcu_dereference(net_device_ctx->vf_netdev);
 	if (vf_netdev && (vf_netdev->flags & IFF_UP))
 		net = vf_netdev;
@@ -667,6 +668,7 @@ int netvsc_recv_callback(struct hv_device *device_obj,
 	skb = netvsc_alloc_recv_skb(net, packet, csum_info, *data, vlan_tci);
 	if (unlikely(!skb)) {
 		++net->stats.rx_dropped;
+		rcu_read_unlock();
 		return NVSP_STAT_FAIL;
 	}
 
@@ -696,6 +698,7 @@ int netvsc_recv_callback(struct hv_device *device_obj,
 	 * TODO - use NAPI?
 	 */
 	netif_rx(skb);
+	rcu_read_unlock();
 
 	return 0;
 }
-- 
2.11.0