netdev - RE: [RFC PATCH net-next v4 1/2] macb: Add 1588 support in Cadence GEM.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 11 Jan 2017 14:34:13 +0000
From:   <Andrei.Pistirica@...rochip.com>
To:     <richardcochran@...il.com>, <rafalo@...ence.com>,
        <harinikatakamlinux@...il.com>, <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
        <harini.katakam@...inx.com>
CC:     <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
        <punnaia@...inx.com>, <michals@...inx.com>, <anirudh@...inx.com>,
        <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
        <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>, <tbultel@...elsurmer.com>
Subject: RE: [RFC PATCH net-next v4 1/2] macb: Add 1588 support in Cadence
 GEM.

 
> On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 10:47:56AM +0000, Rafal Ozieblo wrote:
> > We could use only descriptor approach but there are many Atmel's cores
> on the market which support only event registers.
> 
> As I said in my other reply in this thread, the Atmel cores cannot possibly be
> made to work correctly.
> 
> Sad, but true.

In conscience, I will make a patch containing only the common code (just to benefit from this effort) and then Rafal can add the driver for the GXL version on top of it.
Everybody agrees with this?

Best regards,
Andrei

> 
> Thanks,
> Richard