netdev - Re: [PATCH] wext: handle NULL exta data in iwe_stream_add

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 11 Jan 2017 15:38:42 +0100
From:   Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:     linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] wext: handle NULL exta data in iwe_stream_add_point
 better

On Wed, 2017-01-11 at 15:35 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> gcc-7 complains that wl3501_cs passes NULL into a function that
> then uses the argument as the input for memcpy:
> 
> drivers/net/wireless/wl3501_cs.c: In function 'wl3501_get_scan':
> include/net/iw_handler.h:559:3: error: argument 2 null where non-null 
> expected [-Werror=nonnull]
>    memcpy(stream + point_len, extra, iwe->u.data.length);

I love wext ;-)

> This works fine here because iwe->u.data.length is guaranteed to be
> NULL, and the memcpy doesn't actually have an effect.

I think you mean 0, not NULL, but I can fix that when I apply it.

johannes