netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v2 00/10] net: dsa: Support for pdata in dsa2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 12 Jan 2017 21:34:59 -0500
From:   Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>
To:     Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
        Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "moderated list\:ARM SUB-ARCHITECTURES" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 00/10] net: dsa: Support for pdata in dsa2

Hi Florian,

Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com> writes:

> Hi all,
>
> This is not exactly new, and was sent before, although back then, I did not
> have an user of the pre-declared MDIO board information, but now we do. Note
> that I have additional changes queued up to have b53 register platform data for
> MIPS bcm47xx and bcm63xx.
>
> Yes I know that we should have the Orion platforms eventually be converted to
> Device Tree, but until that happens, I don't want any remaining users of the
> old "dsa" platform device (hence the previous DTS submissions for ARM/mvebu)
> and, there will be platforms out there that most likely won't never see DT
> coming their way (BCM47xx is almost 100% sure, BCM63xx maybe not in a distant
> future).
>
> We would probably want the whole series to be merged via David Miller's tree
> to simplify things.
>
> Greg, can you Ack/Nack patch 5 since it touched the core LDD?
>
> Thanks!

I've tested this patchset on my mv88e6xxx (DTS) boards to make sure
nothing was broken, since it touches the driver. Looks good!

Tested-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>

Thanks,

        Vivien