netdev - Re: [PATCH 3/3] powerpc: bpf: implement in-register swap for 64-bit endian operations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 15 Jan 2017 09:00:58 -0600
From:   Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@....ibm.com>
To:     "'Naveen N. Rao'" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
Cc:     "daniel@...earbox.net" <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        "ast@...com" <ast@...com>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
        "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] powerpc: bpf: implement in-register swap for 64-bit
 endian operations

On Fri, 2017-01-13 at 23:22 +0530, 'Naveen N. Rao' wrote:
> > That rather depends on whether the processor has a store to load forwarder
> > that will satisfy the read from the store buffer.
> > I don't know about ppc, but at least some x86 will do that.
> 
> Interesting - good to know that.
> 
> However, I don't think powerpc does that and in-register swap is likely 
> faster regardless. Note also that gcc prefers this form at higher 
> optimization levels.

Of course powerpc has a load-store forwarder these days, however, I
wouldn't be surprised if the in-register form was still faster on some
implementations, but this needs to be tested.

Ideally, you'd want to try to "optimize" load+swap or swap+store
though.

Cheers,
Ben.