lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sun, 15 Jan 2017 10:18:20 -0500
From:   Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
To:     Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Cc:     davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, jiri@...lanox.com,
        paulb@...lanox.com, john.fastabend@...il.com,
        simon.horman@...ronome.com, mrv@...atatu.com, hadarh@...lanox.com,
        ogerlitz@...lanox.com, roid@...lanox.com, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com,
        daniel@...earbox.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 1/1] net sched actions: Add support for user
 cookies

On 17-01-15 10:01 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 03:01:19PM CET, jhs@...atatu.com wrote:

>> +cls_set_class(struct tcf_proto *tp, unsigned long *clp,
>
> ??
>
>> 	unsigned long cl)
>> {
>> 	unsigned long old_cl;
>> -	
>> +
>
> ??
>
>> 	tcf_tree_lock(tp);
>> 	old_cl = __cls_set_class(clp, cl);
>> 	tcf_tree_unlock(tp);
>> -
>> +
>
> ??
>
>> 	return old_cl;
>> }
>>
>> @@ -237,7 +237,7 @@ static inline int tcf_em_early_end(struct tcf_ematch *em, int result)
>>
>> 	return 0;
>> }
>> -	
>> +
>
> ??
>

All these things with "??" were annoying whitespace and stylistic
things my fingers couldnt resist. It is legit to include such changes
in a patch when touching the code (as long as not a bug fix).

cheers,
jamal

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ