netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 3/9] net/mlx4_core: Set EQ affinity hint to local NUMA CPUs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 16 Jan 2017 23:59:47 +0200
From:   Or Gerlitz <gerlitz.or@...il.com>
To:     Daniel Jurgens <danielj@...lanox.com>
Cc:     Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...lanox.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Eran Ben Elisha <eranbe@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/9] net/mlx4_core: Set EQ affinity hint to local
 NUMA CPUs

On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 11:54 PM, Daniel Jurgens <danielj@...lanox.com> wrote:
> On 1/16/2017 3:44 PM, Or Gerlitz wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 7:29 PM, Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...lanox.com> wrote:
>>> From: Daniel Jurgens <danielj@...lanox.com>
>>>
>>> Use CPUs on the close NUMA when setting the EQ affinity hints.
>> Dan, are we sure there are no down-sides for always doing this? this
>> code is probably there for many years and we're introducing here new
>> behaviour to potentially to many Ms installs when they get distro
>> update that includes this patch.


> I don't see a downside, this just favors using the node local CPUs before others.

OK, so this just favors before others and not limits (not in front of
the code now)? would be good to improve the change log and make this
clear.

> I don't understand your 2nd sentence there.  "Ms installs"?

Millions of installs that run Linux driver.