lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 19 Jan 2017 20:08:30 +0200
From:   Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
To:     "John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>
Cc:     David Arcari <darcari@...hat.com>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>,
        linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: ethtool: avoid allocation failure for dump_regs

"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com> writes:

> I forgot to Cc Johannes and Kalle...

Also adding linux-wireless.

> On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 09:15:09AM -0500, John W. Linville wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 07:35:22AM -0500, David Arcari wrote:
>> > On 01/18/2017 11:45 AM, David Miller wrote:
>> > > From: David Arcari <darcari@...hat.com>
>> > > Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 08:34:05 -0500
>> > >
>> > >> If the user executes 'ethtool -d' for an interface and the associated
>> > >> get_regs_len() function returns 0, the user will see a call trace from
>> > >> the vmalloc() call in ethtool_get_regs().  This patch modifies
>> > >> ethtool_get_regs() to avoid the call to vmalloc when the size is zero.
>> > >>
>> > >> Signed-off-by: David Arcari <darcari@...hat.com>
>> > > I think when the driver indicates this, it is equivalent to saying that
>> > > the operation isn't supported.
>> > >
>> > > Also, this guards us against ->get_regs() methods that don't handle
>> > > zero length requests properly.  I see many which are going to do
>> > > really terrible things in that situation.
>> > >
>> > > Therefore, if get_regs_len() returns zero, treat it the safe as if the
>> > > ethtool operations were NULL.
>> > >
>> > > Thanks.
>> > 
>> > That was actually the fix that I was originally considering, but it
>> > turns out
>> > there is a problem with it.
>> > 
>> > I found that the vmalloc error was occurring because
>> > ieee80211_get_regs_len() in
>> > net/mac80211/ethtool.c was returning zero.  The ieee80211_get_regs in
>> > the same
>> > file returns the hw version. It turns out that this information is used
>> > by the
>> > at76c50x-usb driver in the user space ethtool to report which HW variant
>> > is in
>> > use.  Returning an error when regs_len() returns zero would break this
>> > functionality.
>> > 
>> > -Dave
>> 
>> I'm responsible for this mess. The original idea was for various
>> mac80211-based drivers to override the ethtool operation and provide
>> their own dump operation, but the mac80211 crowd never embraced
>> the idea.
>> 
>> In the meantime, I added the default implementation which just
>> passed-up wdev->wiphy->hw_version as the version info for a 0-length
>> register dump. I then implemented a driver-specific regiser dump
>> handler for userland ethtool that would interpret the hardware version
>> information for the at76c50x-usb driver.
>> 
>> So the net of it is, if we treat a return of 0 from get_regs_len()
>> as "not supported", we break this one driver-specific feature for
>> userland ethtool. Realistically, there are probably very few users
>> to care. But I can't guarantee that the number is zero.

I know the number is not zero, because I remember using it years back
with something else than at76c50x-usb. But is the number more than one,
I don't know :)

>> Possible solutions:
>> 
>> 	-- break userland ethtool for at76c50x-usb
>> 	-- avoid 0-len allocation attempt (David Arcari's patch)
>> 	-- make allocator accept a 0 length value w/o oops'ing
>> 	-- change mac8011 code to return non-zero from get_regs_len()
>> 
>> Thoughts? The last option holds a certain attraction, but I'm not
>> sure how to make it useful...?

If it were only about at76c50x-usb I would say go for it, nobody sane
should use that device anymore. But on the other hand I'm worried that
this interface might be used by other (proprietary) user space tools
with other, more important, drivers. A difficult situation.

-- 
Kalle Valo

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ