netdev - Re: [Xen-devel] xennet_start

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 19 Jan 2017 17:41:23 -0500
From:   Sowmini Varadhan <sowmini.varadhan@...cle.com>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     Paul.Durrant@...rix.com, konrad.wilk@...cle.com,
        wei.liu2@...rix.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] xennet_start_xmit assumptions

On (01/19/17 13:47), Sowmini Varadhan wrote:
> > Specifically I'm talking about the dev_validate_header() check.
> > That is supposed to protect us from these kinds of situations.
> 
> ah, but I run my pf_packet application as root, so I have 
> capable(CAP_SYS_RAWIO), so I slip through the dev_validate_header()
> check.

and in that light, should dev_validate_header()
always return false if len == 0?

that will take care of all the send paths in af_packet.c
but it impacts all drivers as well (even though it is the
logically correct thing to do..)

--Sowmini