netdev - Re: [PATCH iproute2 net-next] tc: flower: support matching flags

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 19 Jan 2017 13:39:41 +0200
From:   Paul Blakey <paulb@...lanox.com>
To:     Jiri Benc <jbenc@...hat.com>
CC:     <paulb@...lanox.com>, Simon Horman <simon.horman@...ronome.com>,
        <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Hadar Hen Zion <hadarh@...lanox.com>,
        Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>,
        Roi Dayan <roid@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH iproute2 net-next] tc: flower: support matching flags



On 18/01/2017 14:41, Jiri Benc wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Jan 2017 12:55:59 +0100, Jiri Benc wrote:
>> On Wed, 4 Jan 2017 13:51:13 +0200, Paul Blakey wrote:
>>> It mimics the kernel packing of flags, I have no problem either way
>>> (flags, or ip_flags/tcp_flags pairs), what do you think jiri?
>>
>> What Simon says makes sense to me. ip_flags and tcp_flags sounds like
>> the best solution so far (even better than my original suggestion).
>
> Is there any progress with the follow up patch? I don't think we want
> iproute2 with the magic numbers to be released.
>
> Thanks,
>
>  Jiri
>



Hi,
I've posted a patch:
"[PATCH iproute2 net-next] tc: flower: Refactor matching flags to be 
more user friendly"

Thanks,
Paul.