netdev - Re: [net-next PATCH 0/3] Retrieve number of VFs in a bus-agnostic way

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 20 Jan 2017 17:59:14 +0100
From:   Phil Sutter <phil@....cc>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     bhelgaas@...gle.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH 0/3] Retrieve number of VFs in a bus-agnostic way

On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 11:43:46AM -0500, David Miller wrote:
> From: Phil Sutter <phil@....cc>
> Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 14:04:36 +0100
> 
> > Previously, it was assumed that only PCI NICs would be capable of having
> > virtual functions - with my proposed enhancement of dummy NIC driver
> > implementing (fake) ones for testing purposes, this is no longer true.
> > 
> > Discussion of said patch has led to the suggestion of implementing a
> > bus-agnostic method for VF count retrieval so rtnetlink could work with
> > both real VF-capable PCI NICs as well as my dummy modifications without
> > introducing ugly hacks.
> > 
> > The following series tries to achieve just that by introducing a bus
> > type callback to retrieve a device's number of VFs, implementing this
> > callback for PCI bus and finally adjusting rtnetlink to make use of the
> > generalized infrastructure.
> 
> This is really nice and clean, compare it to your original approach :-)

Yes, indeed! Thanks a lot for pointing me into the right direction. :)

Cheers, Phil