netdev - Re: [PATCHv3 net-next 4/4] sctp: implement sender-side procedures for Add Incoming/Outgoing Streams Request Parameter

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 24 Jan 2017 11:10:08 -0200
From:   "'Marcelo Ricardo Leitner'" <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>
To:     David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
Cc:     "'Xin Long'" <lucien.xin@...il.com>,
        network dev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org" <linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org>,
        Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>,
        Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@...il.com>,
        "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 net-next 4/4] sctp: implement sender-side procedures
 for Add Incoming/Outgoing Streams Request Parameter

On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 12:34:06PM +0000, David Laight wrote:
> From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
> > Sent: 23 January 2017 18:48
> > On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 11:25:56AM +0000, David Laight wrote:
> > > From: Xin Long
> > > > Sent: 19 January 2017 17:19
> > > > This patch is to implement Sender-Side Procedures for the Add
> > > > Outgoing and Incoming Streams Request Parameter described in
> > > > rfc6525 section 5.1.5-5.1.6.
> > > >
> > > > It is also to add sockopt SCTP_ADD_STREAMS in rfc6525 section
> > > > 6.3.4 for users.
> > > ...
> > > > +	out = params->sas_outstrms;
> > > > +	in  = params->sas_instrms;
> > > > +
> > > > +	if (!out && !in)
> > > > +		goto out;
> > > > +
> > > > +	if (out) {
> > > > +		__u16 nums = stream->outcnt + out;
> > >
> > > Make nums 'unsigned int', the code will be smaller and you can
> > > use the value for the overflow check.
> > 
> > Smaller as in to avoid the sum below?
> > 
> > >
> > > > +		/* Check for overflow, can't use nums here */
> > > > +		if (stream->outcnt + out > SCTP_MAX_STREAM)
> > > > +			goto out;
> 
> No, smaller as in not requiring the compiler to add instructions
> to mask (or worse sign extend) the result of the arithmetic expression
> to less than the number of bits in an 'int' when the result of the
> expression is to be kept in a register.
> 
> The x86 is about the only modern cpu that has 8 and 16 bit arithmetic.
> For everything else you really don't want to do arithmetic on char
> and short unless you really want the wrapping to happen.

Okay thanks.

  Marcelo