lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 11:46:45 +0300 From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com> To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@...il.com>, Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Joe Stringer <joe@....org>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [patch] samples/bpf: silence shift wrapping warning On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 10:44:34PM -0800, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 5:27 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo > <arnaldo.melo@...il.com> wrote: > > Em Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 02:51:25PM -0800, Alexei Starovoitov escreveu: > >> On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 07:51:43AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > >> > max_key is a value in the 0-63 range, so on 32 bit systems the shift > >> > could wrap. > >> > > >> > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com> > >> > >> Looks fine. I think 'net-next' is ok. > > > > I could process these patches, if that would help, > > Thanks for the offer. > I don't think there will be conflicts with all the work happening in net-next, > but it's best to avoid even possibility of it when we can. > Dan, > can you please resend the patch cc-ing Dave and netdev ? > please mention [PATCH net-next] in the subject. > Sure. regards, dan carpenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists