netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] net: ethtool: convert large order kmalloc allocations to vzalloc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 30 Jan 2017 19:28:01 -0800
From:   Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:     Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] net: ethtool: convert large order kmalloc
 allocations to vzalloc

On Mon, 2017-01-30 at 18:25 -0800, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> under memory pressure 'ethtool -S' command may warn:
> [ 2374.385195] ethtool: page allocation failure: order:4, mode:0x242c0c0
> [ 2374.405573] CPU: 12 PID: 40211 Comm: ethtool Not tainted
> [ 2374.423071] Call Trace:
> [ 2374.423076]  [<ffffffff8148cb29>] dump_stack+0x4d/0x64
> [ 2374.423080]  [<ffffffff811667cb>] warn_alloc_failed+0xeb/0x150
> [ 2374.423082]  [<ffffffff81169cd3>] ? __alloc_pages_direct_compact+0x43/0xf0
> [ 2374.423084]  [<ffffffff8116a25c>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x4dc/0xbf0
> [ 2374.423091]  [<ffffffffa0023dc2>] ? cmd_exec+0x722/0xcd0 [mlx5_core]
> [ 2374.423095]  [<ffffffff811b3dcc>] alloc_pages_current+0x8c/0x110
> [ 2374.423097]  [<ffffffff81168859>] alloc_kmem_pages+0x19/0x90
> [ 2374.423099]  [<ffffffff81186e5e>] kmalloc_order_trace+0x2e/0xe0
> [ 2374.423101]  [<ffffffff811c0084>] __kmalloc+0x204/0x220
> [ 2374.423105]  [<ffffffff816c269e>] dev_ethtool+0xe4e/0x1f80
> [ 2374.423106]  [<ffffffff816b967e>] ? dev_get_by_name_rcu+0x5e/0x80
> [ 2374.423108]  [<ffffffff816d6926>] dev_ioctl+0x156/0x560
> [ 2374.423111]  [<ffffffff811d4c68>] ? mem_cgroup_commit_charge+0x78/0x3c0
> [ 2374.423117]  [<ffffffff8169d542>] sock_do_ioctl+0x42/0x50
> [ 2374.423119]  [<ffffffff8169d9c3>] sock_ioctl+0x1b3/0x250
> [ 2374.423121]  [<ffffffff811f0f42>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x92/0x580
> [ 2374.423123]  [<ffffffff8100222b>] ? do_audit_syscall_entry+0x4b/0x70
> [ 2374.423124]  [<ffffffff8100287c>] ? syscall_trace_enter_phase1+0xfc/0x120
> [ 2374.423126]  [<ffffffff811f14a9>] SyS_ioctl+0x79/0x90
> [ 2374.423127]  [<ffffffff81002bb0>] do_syscall_64+0x50/0xa0
> [ 2374.423129]  [<ffffffff817e19bc>] entry_SYSCALL64_slow_path+0x25/0x25
> 
> ~1160 mlx5 counters ~= order 4 allocation which is unlikely to succeed
> under memory pressure. Convert them to vzalloc() as ethtool_get_regs() does.
> Also take care of drivers without counters similar to
> commit 67ae7cf1eeda ("ethtool: Allow zero-length register dumps again")
> and reduce warn_on to warn_on_once.

I think this is generally not a good idea as
most uses already fit fine in a kcalloc.

Maybe use Michal Hocko's kvmalloc changes.
https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/1/30/120