netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] ixgbe: add af

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 31 Jan 2017 20:58:36 -0800
From:   John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
To:     Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...com>, bjorn.topel@...il.com,
        jasowang@...hat.com, alexander.duyck@...il.com, brouer@...hat.com
Cc:     john.r.fastabend@...el.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] ixgbe: add af_packet direct copy support

On 17-01-30 06:53 PM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On 1/27/17 1:34 PM, John Fastabend wrote:
>> +    h2 = page_address(rx_buffer->page) + rx_buffer->page_offset - hdrlen;
>> +    eth = page_address(rx_buffer->page) + rx_buffer->page_offset,
> 
> I don't think it compiles ;)

Well that is what I get for doing some last minute checkpatch fixes
and not doing a build test before sending it out. Oh well just an RFC
to get some general feedback.

> 
>> +    /* This indicates a bug in ixgbe leaving for testing purposes */
>> +    WARN_ON(TP_STATUS_USER & h2->tp_status);
>> +    len = le16_to_cpu(rx_desc->wb.upper.length);
>> +    h2->tp_len = len;
>> +    h2->tp_snaplen = len;
>> +    h2->tp_mac = ALIGN(TPACKET_ALIGN(TPACKET2_HDRLEN), L1_CACHE_BYTES);
>> +    h2->tp_net = h2->tp_mac + ETH_HLEN;
>> +    h2->tp_sec = div_s64_rem(ns, NSEC_PER_SEC, &rem);
>> +    h2->tp_nsec = rem;
>> +
>> +    sll = (void *)h2 + TPACKET_ALIGN(sizeof(struct tpacket2_hdr));
>> +    sll->sll_halen = ETH_HLEN;
>> +    memcpy(sll->sll_addr, eth->h_source, ETH_ALEN);
>> +    sll->sll_family = AF_PACKET;
>> +    sll->sll_hatype = rx_ring->netdev->type;
>> +    sll->sll_protocol = eth->h_proto;
>> +    sll->sll_pkttype = PACKET_HOST;
>> +    sll->sll_ifindex = rx_ring->netdev->ifindex;
> 
> performance wise it looks very expensive to do all these header copies
> and integer divide for every packet.
> I think unless we move to new dumb and simple header format
> performance of this approach is not going to be satisfactory.
> 

Sure I'm not opposed to moving to a v4 in fact I think it would help
in a lot of ways. I'll try to fire off some benchmarks and then move
to a v4 to see how that works out.

.John