[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2017 17:11:59 +0100
From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Yehuda Yitschak <yehuday@...vell.com>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Hanna Hawa <hannah@...vell.com>,
Nadav Haklai <nadavh@...vell.com>,
Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>,
Stefan Chulski <stefanc@...vell.com>,
Marcin Wojtas <mw@...ihalf.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 net-next 09/11] net: mvpp2: simplify MVPP2_PRS_RI_*
definitions
Hello,
On Fri, 6 Jan 2017 13:07:27 +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> #define MVPP2_PRS_RI_L2_CAST_MASK (BIT(10) | BIT(9))
> #define MVPP2_PRS_RI_L2_UCAST 0
> #define MVPP2_PRS_RI_L2_MCAST BIT(9)
> #define MVPP2_PRS_RI_L2_BCAST BIT(10)
Your comment makes perfect sense, so I've adopted this second option
you suggested. This is in my v3 I sent a few minutes ago.
Thanks!
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists