netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] Extract IFE logic to module

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 3 Feb 2017 16:29:10 +0100
From:   Simon Horman <simon.horman@...ronome.com>
To:     Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
Cc:     Yotam Gigi <yotamg@...lanox.com>,
        "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>, Elad Raz <eladr@...lanox.com>,
        Ido Schimmel <idosch@...lanox.com>,
        Roman Mashak <mrv@...atatu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] Extract IFE logic to module

No objections here.

On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 2:02 PM, Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com> wrote:
> On 17-02-02 06:12 AM, Yotam Gigi wrote:
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>
>
>>>
>>> I have no objection to this modularisation but I am curious to know
>>> if you have a use-case in mind. My understanding is that earlier versions
>>> of the sample action used IFE but that is not the case in the version
>>> that
>>> was ultimately accepted.
>>
>>
>> Hi Simon.
>>
>> You are right that the patches were done for the former version of the
>> sample
>> classifier, and there are not required for the current version. We don't
>> have
>> current use-case in mind, but I did send the patches because I think it
>> can help
>> others, or us in the future.
>
>
> For what its worth given Yotam has done this work and vetted it and weve
> reviewed and discussed it in the past, I am going to sign off on it.
>
>
> cheers,
> jamal
>