lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sat, 4 Feb 2017 19:33:14 -0800
From:   Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To:     Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
Cc:     Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        David Ahern <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com>,
        Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
        "Eric W . Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
        Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net] bpf: add bpf_sk_netns_id() helper

On Sat, Feb 4, 2017 at 7:25 PM, Alexei Starovoitov
<alexei.starovoitov@...il.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 04, 2017 at 09:15:10AM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 5:22 PM, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...com> wrote:
>> > Note that all bpf programs types are global.
>>
>> I don't think this has a clear enough meaning to work with.  In
>
> Please clarify what you mean. The quoted part says
> "bpf programs are global". What is not "clear enough" there?

What does "bpf programs are global" mean?  I am genuinely unable to
figure out what you mean.  Here are some example guesses of what you
might mean:

 - BPF programs are compiled independently of a namespace.  This is
certainly true, but I don't think it matters.

 - You want BPF programs to affect everything on the system.  But this
doesn't seem right to be -- they only affect things in the relevant
cgroup, so they're not global in that sense.

 - You want BPF programs to affect everything in their cgroup
regardless of namespace.  This does seem to be what you think, but it
doesn't say *why*, which is the relevant bit.

 - The set of BPF program types and the verification rules are
independent of cgroup and namespace.  This is true, but I don't think
it matters.

That's all I came up with.  So, I'll repeat: what does "bpf programs
are global" mean?

>
>> I think that this patch plus a minor change to prevent installing
>> cgroup+bpf programs if the installer isn't in the init netns + fs ns
>> would work because it would allow new, migratable semantics to be
>> added down the road to relax the restriction.
>
> Forcing installer to be in init netns is not acceptable to David
> who added cgroup_sock in the first place. I'm not sure why
> we have to discuss that bit in circles.
>

Because we're one week or so from 4.10 final, the 4.10-rc code is
problematic even for ip vrf, and there isn't a clear solution yet.
There are a bunch of requirements that seem to conflict, and something
has to give.

--Andy

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux - Powered by OpenVZ