lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sun, 12 Feb 2017 15:53:44 +0000
From:   "Mintz, Yuval" <Yuval.Mintz@...ium.com>
To:     Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
CC:     "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Kalluru, Sudarsana" <Sudarsana.Kalluru@...ium.com>,
        "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next v4 1/2] qed: Add infrastructure for PTP support.

> The original would return val == 1, period == 62499999; While this does have
> some error [val / (period * 16 + 8) is slightly bigger than 1 / 10^9, error at
> 18[?] digit after dot], it's the best we can configure for the HW.

Correction. That's actually not *the best* we could configure -
 due to stopping at the first value between equal differences.
[you've already commented on that in the past, mentioning  that we
should use >= and not >].

But that doesn't change the fact that your approximation can choose
numbers which can't be configured to the HW, and as a result incorrectly
pick some that will not minimize the approximation error.

> One simple adjustment we could do is simply break from the loop If 'diff ==
> 0'. At least for small PPB value this would be hit relatively quickly.

Given the previous correction, the suggestion would also include
reversing the order of the iteration [7 -> 1 instead of 1 -> 7].

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ