netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next V2 1/6] net/sched: cls

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 15 Feb 2017 10:20:54 +0200
From:   Or Gerlitz <gerlitz.or@...il.com>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kubakici@...pl>
Cc:     Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@...el.com>,
        Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
        Roi Dayan <roid@...lanox.com>,
        Paul Blakey <paulb@...lanox.com>,
        Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next V2 1/6] net/sched: cls_matchall: Dump skip flags

On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 9:28 PM, Jakub Kicinski <kubakici@...pl> wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Feb 2017 16:30:35 +0200, Or Gerlitz wrote:
>> The skip flags are not dumped to user-space, do that.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>
>> Acked-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>
>> Acked-by: Yotam Gigi <yotamg@...lanox.com>
>> ---
>>  net/sched/cls_matchall.c | 2 ++
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/sched/cls_matchall.c b/net/sched/cls_matchall.c
>> index f2141cb..ce2f7d4 100644
>> --- a/net/sched/cls_matchall.c
>> +++ b/net/sched/cls_matchall.c
>> @@ -244,6 +244,8 @@ static int mall_dump(struct net *net, struct tcf_proto *tp, unsigned long fh,
>>           nla_put_u32(skb, TCA_MATCHALL_CLASSID, head->res.classid))
>>               goto nla_put_failure;
>>
>> +     nla_put_u32(skb, TCA_MATCHALL_FLAGS, head->flags);
>> +
>
> Shouldn't the return status from nla_put_u32() be checked?

Yeah, amazing how the developer (me) and three internal reviewers
missed that :(, thanks!

Or.