netdev - Re: [patch net-next RFC 0/8] Add support for pipeline debug (dpipe)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 16 Feb 2017 19:40:16 +0100
From:   Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, arkadis@...lanox.com,
        idosch@...lanox.com, mlxsw@...lanox.com, jhs@...atatu.com,
        ivecera@...hat.com, roopa@...ulusnetworks.com,
        f.fainelli@...il.com, vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com,
        john.fastabend@...il.com
Subject: Re: [patch net-next RFC 0/8] Add support for pipeline debug (dpipe)

Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 06:04:46PM CET, andrew@...n.ch wrote:
>On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 04:22:36PM +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>
>
>Hi Jiri, Arkadi
>
>Just to make sure we are all on the same page here:
>
>This purely RFC. It is not intended for the merge window starting next
>week?

No. We are aiming next net-next open.


>
>This is a new binary API, something we have to live with forever. So i
>think before it gets merged into a Linus kernel, we need time to think
>about all the different sorts of tables we want to dump, what sort of
>fields they have, and can we represent them using this API. That is
>going to take some time.

Agreed.