lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 14 Mar 2017 15:35:59 -0700
From:   David Daney <ddaney@...iumnetworks.com>
To:     Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        David Daney <david.daney@...ium.com>,
        linux-mips@...ux-mips.org, ralf@...ux-mips.org,
        James Hogan <james.hogan@...tec.com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        "Steven J. Hill" <steven.hill@...ium.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] MIPS: BPF: JIT fixes and improvements.

On 03/14/2017 03:29 PM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> On 03/14/2017 10:21 PM, David Daney wrote:
>> Changes from v1:
>>
>>    - Use unsigned access for SKF_AD_HATYPE
>>
>>    - Added three more patches for other problems found.
>>
>>
>> Testing the BPF JIT on Cavium OCTEON (mips64) with the test-bpf module
>> identified some failures and unimplemented features.
>
> Nice, thanks for working on this! If you see specific test
> cases for the JIT missing, please also feel free to extend
> the test_bpf suite, so this gets exposed further to other
> JITs, too.
>
>> With this patch set we get:
>>
>>       test_bpf: Summary: 305 PASSED, 0 FAILED, [85/297 JIT'ed]
>>
>> Both big and little endian tested.
>>
>> We still lack eBPF support, but this is better than nothing.
>
> Any future plans on this one?

Yes, my plan is to fully implement eBPF support for 64-bit MIPS, let's 
see if I get enough time to do it.

David.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists