lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 15:35:59 -0700 From: David Daney <ddaney@...iumnetworks.com> To: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, David Daney <david.daney@...ium.com>, linux-mips@...ux-mips.org, ralf@...ux-mips.org, James Hogan <james.hogan@...tec.com>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "Steven J. Hill" <steven.hill@...ium.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] MIPS: BPF: JIT fixes and improvements. On 03/14/2017 03:29 PM, Daniel Borkmann wrote: > On 03/14/2017 10:21 PM, David Daney wrote: >> Changes from v1: >> >> - Use unsigned access for SKF_AD_HATYPE >> >> - Added three more patches for other problems found. >> >> >> Testing the BPF JIT on Cavium OCTEON (mips64) with the test-bpf module >> identified some failures and unimplemented features. > > Nice, thanks for working on this! If you see specific test > cases for the JIT missing, please also feel free to extend > the test_bpf suite, so this gets exposed further to other > JITs, too. > >> With this patch set we get: >> >> test_bpf: Summary: 305 PASSED, 0 FAILED, [85/297 JIT'ed] >> >> Both big and little endian tested. >> >> We still lack eBPF support, but this is better than nothing. > > Any future plans on this one? Yes, my plan is to fully implement eBPF support for 64-bit MIPS, let's see if I get enough time to do it. David.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists