lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 16:22:58 +0100 From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk> Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, Microchip Linux Driver Support <UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, Woojung Huh <woojung.huh@...rochip.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/7] phylib MMD accessor cleanups > Thanks. When I posted this last time around (19th Jan) I mentioned > about marking the old _indirect() accessors with __deprecated - is > that still something we want to do? > > I haven't tested this against net-next yet, so I don't know if there > are any new users of the indirect accessors - going down the deprecated > route would avoid breakage, but means having to submit a patch later to > actually remove them. > > How would people want this handled? Hi Russell We can get patches into net-next very quickly. So i suggest you rebase and resubmit and get it in. If something breaks, we add followup patches to fix it. Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists