netdev - RE: [PATCH] net: convert sk_filter.refcnt from atomic_t to refcount

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 21 Mar 2017 10:43:12 +0000
From:   "Reshetova, Elena" <elena.reshetova@...el.com>
To:     Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
CC:     "ast@...com" <ast@...com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Hans Liljestrand <ishkamiel@...il.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        David Windsor <dwindsor@...il.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] net: convert sk_filter.refcnt from atomic_t to
 refcount_t

> On 03/20/2017 10:37 AM, Elena Reshetova wrote:
> [...]
> > diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c
> > index ebaeaf2..389cb8d 100644
> > --- a/net/core/filter.c
> > +++ b/net/core/filter.c
> > @@ -928,7 +928,7 @@ static void sk_filter_release_rcu(struct rcu_head *rcu)
> >    */
> >   static void sk_filter_release(struct sk_filter *fp)
> >   {
> > -	if (atomic_dec_and_test(&fp->refcnt))
> > +	if (refcount_dec_and_test(&fp->refcnt))
> >   		call_rcu(&fp->rcu, sk_filter_release_rcu);
> >   }
> >
> > @@ -943,20 +943,27 @@ void sk_filter_uncharge(struct sock *sk, struct
> sk_filter *fp)
> >   /* try to charge the socket memory if there is space available
> >    * return true on success
> >    */
> > -bool sk_filter_charge(struct sock *sk, struct sk_filter *fp)
> > +bool __sk_filter_charge(struct sock *sk, struct sk_filter *fp)
> 
> And this then becomes: static bool __sk_filter_charge(...)

Ups, I guess I am getting too tired of all these patch sendings, so more and more mistakes slide in. 
Will try switching to smth else to get attention back in order. 

> 
> >   {
> >   	u32 filter_size = bpf_prog_size(fp->prog->len);
> >
> >   	/* same check as in sock_kmalloc() */
> >   	if (filter_size <= sysctl_optmem_max &&
> >   	    atomic_read(&sk->sk_omem_alloc) + filter_size <
> sysctl_optmem_max) {
> > -		atomic_inc(&fp->refcnt);
> >   		atomic_add(filter_size, &sk->sk_omem_alloc);
> >   		return true;
> >   	}
> >   	return false;
> >   }
> 
> Since here is just all in slow-path, looks fine to me if the above
> is addressed as well in v3:
> 
> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
> 
> Please make sure you add [PATCH net-next] in your subject in future
> so that it's clear which tree this goes to.

Thank you very much! Will do. 

Best Regards,
Elena.
> 
> Thanks,
> Daniel