netdev - Re: [v2,net-next,1/3] net: stmmac: enable multiple buffers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 24 Mar 2017 17:19:00 +0000
From:   Joao Pinto <Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, <Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com>
CC:     <clabbe.montjoie@...il.com>, <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        <peppe.cavallaro@...com>, <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
        <f.fainelli@...il.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [v2,net-next,1/3] net: stmmac: enable multiple buffers

Às 5:17 PM de 3/24/2017, David Miller escreveu:
> From: Joao Pinto <Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com>
> Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 15:02:27 +0000
> 
>> Yes, I agree, it is better to revert and leave the tree functional for all.
>>
>> @David Miller:
>> The multiple-buffer patch introduced some problems in some setups that are being
>> hard to debug, so Corentin gave the idea of reverting the until
>> commit 7bac4e1ec3ca2342929a39638d615c6b672c27a0 (net: stmmac: stmmac interrupt
>> treatment prepared for multiple queues), which I fully agree.
>>
>> In my setup is ok, but the idea is to have everyone's setup working :), so lets
>> break them into smaller pieces, and let's only apply them when everyone confirms
>> that is working ok in your setups, agree?
>>
>> What is the typical mechanism for this? I send a patch reverting them?
> 
> If you can compose a single "git revert" command to achieve this, just
> tell me what it is and I'll do it.
> 
> Otherwise send a patch that does the revert.

Ok, I sent 2 patches with fixes. Let's see if you get some happy clients.
If not, I will inform the commit id to revert.

Thanks David.

> 
> Thanks.
>