netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v3 0/2] GTP SGSN-side tunnels

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 24 Mar 2017 11:15:25 +0100
From:   Harald Welte <laforge@...monks.org>
To:     Jonas Bonn <jonas@...thpole.se>
Cc:     pablo@...filter.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 0/2] GTP SGSN-side tunnels

Hi Jonas,

looks fine to me, but I haven't tested it.  Did you manually test it
using the extended libgtpnl + tools?

Also, in code like this:

+       if (gtp->role == GTP_ROLE_SGSN) {
+               pctx = ipv4_pdp_find(gtp, iph->saddr);
+       } else {

I think general Linux kernel coding style is to not have curly-brackets
around single-line blocks. See "Do not unnecessarily use braces where a
single statement will do." in line 169 of
Documentation/process/coding-style.rst

I won't mind your current style, and it is not a blocker issue to me,
but still it would be nice for general consistency.

Acked-by: Harald Welte <laforge@...monks.org>

-- 
- Harald Welte <laforge@...monks.org>           http://laforge.gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
                                                  (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)