netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v1 1/1] L2TP device MTU setup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 12 Apr 2017 10:13:00 -0400 (EDT)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     parameswaran.r7@...il.com
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, kleptog@...na.org, jchapman@...alix.com,
        nprachan@...cade.com, rshearma@...cade.com,
        stephen@...workplumber.org, sdietric@...cade.com,
        ciwillia@...cade.com, lboccass@...cade.com, dfawcus@...cade.com,
        bhong@...cade.com, jblunck@...cade.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1 1/1] L2TP device MTU setup - tunnel socket
 needs a lock

From: "R. Parameswaran" <parameswaran.r7@...il.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 20:14:37 -0700 (PDT)

> 
> The MTU overhead calculation in L2TP device set-up
> merged via commit b784e7ebfce8cfb16c6f95e14e8532d0768ab7ff
> needs to be adjusted to lock the tunnel socket while
> referencing the sub-data structures to derive the
> socket's IP overhead.

This is missing a proper signoff.

The subject line also needs to be fixed "[PATCH net-next] l2tp: " as explained
by Guillaume.

Thanks.