netdev - Re: [patch net-next 00/10] net: sched: introduce multichain support for filters

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 1 May 2017 22:26:07 -0700
From:   Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To:     Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
        David Ahern <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>,
        mlxsw@...lanox.com, Simon Horman <simon.horman@...ronome.com>
Subject: Re: [patch net-next 00/10] net: sched: introduce multichain support
 for filters

On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 3:34 PM, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us> wrote:
> Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 07:40:24PM CEST, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com wrote:
>>On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 11:53 PM, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us> wrote:
>>> Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 07:46:03PM CEST, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com wrote:
>>>>On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 4:12 AM, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us> wrote:
>>>>> Simple example:
>>>>> $ tc qdisc add dev eth0 ingress
>>>>> $ tc filter add dev eth0 parent ffff: protocol ip pref 33 flower dst_mac 52:54:00:3d:c7:6d action goto chain 11
>>>>> $ tc filter add dev eth0 parent ffff: protocol ip pref 22 chain 11 flower dst_ip 192.168.40.1 action drop
>>>>> $ tc filter show dev eth0 root
>>>>
>>>>Interesting.
>>>>
>>>>I don't look into the code yet. If I understand the concepts correctly,
>>>>so with your patchset we can mark either filter with a chain No. to
>>>>choose which chain it belongs to _logically_ even though
>>>>_physically_ it is still in the old-fashion chain (prio, proto)?
>>>
>>> You have to see the code :)
>>
>>I don't understand why I have to, these are high-level concepts
>>and should be put in your cover letter (aka. design doc). You miss
>>a lot of information about the ordering here.
>
> Well, the description is one thing, but seeing the actual code should
> put the whole view. But if you are missing something, I can add it. What
> do you mean by "information about the ordering"?
>

By ordering, I mean:

1) before your patch, filters are ordered by prio and categorized by proto

2) after your patch, we can jump from one filter to a specified one, how
does this work or not work with the prio/proto?