netdev - Re: [PATCH V6 net-next iproute] ip: Add support for netdev events to monitor

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 31 May 2017 16:27:03 -0400
From:   Vlad Yasevich <vyasevic@...hat.com>
To:     Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
        Vladislav Yasevich <vyasevich@...il.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, dsahern@...il.com,
        roopa@...ulusnetworks.com, jiri@...nulli.us, vfalico@...il.com,
        andy@...yhouse.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 net-next iproute] ip: Add support for netdev events to
 monitor

On 05/30/2017 02:26 PM, Vlad Yasevich wrote:
> On 05/30/2017 01:12 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>> On Sat, 27 May 2017 10:14:36 -0400
>> Vladislav Yasevich <vyasevich@...il.com> wrote:
>>
>>>  
>>> +static const char *netdev_events[] = {"NONE",
>>> +				      "REBOOT",
>>> +				      "FEATURE CHANGE",
>>> +				      "BONDING FAILOVER",
>>> +				      "NOTIFY PEERS",
>>> +				      "RESEND IGMP",
>>> +				      "BONDING OPTION"};
>>
>> Overall this looks fine, I will pickup the if_link.h from net-next.
>>
>> One stylistic change.
>>
>> Please add simple line break, and initialize by value:
>>
>> static const char *netdev_events[] = {
>> 	[IFLA_EVENT_NONE]	= "NONE",
>> ...
>>
>> Do you want some prefix or bounding around the event output?
> 
> Don't really care about output from my side.  If you think some prefix
> would be good, I can surely add it.
> 
>> Also a little concerned that the output format change may break some program
>> could the new output be at the end of the line?
>>
> 
> I can try moving it to the end.
>

Hi Stephen

So, I looked again at this patch and the output change I am proposing would look
something like this 'ip monitor':

1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 6500 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN group default event
FEATURE CHANGE
    link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00


It's already at the end of the like ant has an 'event' prefix similar to all the other
entries on the top line.  Does that look OK?  I don't think that would break anything.

Thanks
-vlad