[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2017 11:50:07 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: ilant@...lanox.com
Cc: jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com, alexei.starovoitov@...il.com,
saeedm@....mellanox.co.il, dledford@...hat.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
jsorensen@...com, andy.shevchenko@...il.com,
linux-fpga@...r.kernel.org, atull@...nsource.altera.com,
yi1.li@...ux.intel.com, borisp@...lanox.com
Subject: Re: [for-next 4/6] net/mlx5: FPGA, Add basic support for Innova
From: Ilan Tayari <ilant@...lanox.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2017 06:52:15 +0000
> The fact that we configure the FPGA using special inband packets isn't
> changing anything. IMO, it might have been any other bus on the card,
> standard or proprietary, and the arguments for how to design the driver
> would stay the same.
+1
> So neither the host stack nor the network are aware of them.
> They exist momentarily only on the internal traces on the board and not
> anywhere else.
+1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists