netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 1/3] ethtool: Add link down reason callback

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 21 Jun 2017 15:58:09 +0200
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     Gal Pressman <galp@...lanox.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
        Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>,
        Vidya Sagar Ravipati <vidya@...ulusnetworks.com>,
        Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>,
        David Decotigny <decot@...glers.com>, kernel-team@...com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 1/3] ethtool: Add link down reason callback

> +enum {
> +	ETHTOOL_LINK_VENDOR_SPECIFIC = -1, /* Vendor specific issue provided in vendor_reason */
> +	ETHTOOL_LINK_NO_ISSUE, /* No issue observed with link */
> +	ETHTOOL_LINK_REASON_UNKNOWN, /* Unknown reason */

I think OTHER would be better that UNKNOWN. 

> +	ETHTOOL_LINK_NETDEV_CARRIER_DOWN, /* Netdev carrier is down */
> +	ETHTOOL_LINK_ADMIN_DOWN, /* Admin down */

These two are interesting. We have that information already. Why do we
want it again?

> +	ETHTOOL_LINK_AN_FAILED, /* Auto negotiation failed */
> +	ETHTOOL_LINK_TRAINING_FAILED, /* Link training failed */
> +	ETHTOOL_LINK_RMT_FAULT, /* Remote fault indication */
> +	ETHTOOL_LINK_BAD_SIGNAL_INTEGRITY, /* Bad signal integrity */
> +	ETHTOOL_LINK_CABLE_MISMATCH, /* Cable protocol mismatch */
> +	ETHTOOL_LINK_INTERNAL_ERR, /* Internal error */

How does an internet error differ from an UNKNOWN?

> +	ETHTOOL_LINK_CABLE_UNPLUGGED, /* Cable unplugged */
> +	ETHTOOL_LINK_UNSUPP_MODULE, /* Unsupported module */
> +	ETHTOOL_LINK_I2C_BUS_ERR, /* I2C bus error */

Which I2C bus? What about MDIO BUS errors?

> +	ETHTOOL_LINK_UNSUPP_EEPROM, /* Unsupported EEPROM */

Which EEPROM?

> +	ETHTOOL_LINK_OVERTEMP, /* Over temperature */
> +	ETHTOOL_LINK_PWR_BUDGET_EXC, /* Power budget exceeded */
> +	ETHTOOL_LINK_MODULE_ADMIN_DOWN, /* Module admin down */

It seems like these last 6 are all SFP issues? How about putting SFP
into the name?

     Andrew