netdev - Re: [PATCH net] ipv6: no need to return rt->dst.error if it is not null entry.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 26 Jul 2017 12:49:53 -0600
From:   David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To:     Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>
Cc:     Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>,
        Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
        network dev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] ipv6: no need to return rt->dst.error if it is not
 null entry.

On 7/26/17 12:27 PM, Roopa Prabhu wrote:
> agreed...so looks like the check in v3 should be
> 
> 
> +       if ( rt == net->ipv6.ip6_null_entry ||
> +            (rt->dst.error &&
> + #ifdef CONFIG_IPV6_MULTIPLE_TABLES
> +              rt != net->ipv6.ip6_prohibit_entry &&
> +              rt != net->ipv6.ip6_blk_hole_entry &&
> +#endif
> +             )) {
>                 err = rt->dst.error;
>                 ip6_rt_put(rt);
>                 goto errout;
> 

I don't think so. If I add a prohibit route and use the fibmatch
attribute, I want to see the route from the FIB that was matched.