lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 26 Jul 2017 17:03:19 -0700 (PDT)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, daniel@...earbox.net,
        oss-drivers@...ronome.com, alexei.starovoitov@...il.com,
        kafai@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] bpf: don't zero out the info struct in
 bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd()

From: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2017 15:16:12 -0700

> The buffer passed to bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd() should be initialized
> to zeros.  Kernel will enforce that to guarantee we can safely extend
> info structures in the future.
> 
> Making the bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd() call in libbpf perform the zeroing
> is problematic, however, since some members of the info structures
> may need to be initialized by the callers (for instance pointers
> to buffers to which kernel is to dump translated and jited images).
> 
> Remove the zeroing and fix up the in-tree callers before any kernel
> has been released with this code.
> 
> As Daniel points out this seems to be the intended operation anyway,
> since commit 95b9afd3987f ("bpf: Test for bpf ID") is itself setting
> the buffer pointers before calling bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>

Applied, thanks Jakub.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ