lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sat, 29 Jul 2017 23:24:04 -0700 (PDT)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     roopa@...ulusnetworks.com
Cc:     linville@...driver.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        vidya.chowdary@...il.com, dustin@...ulusnetworks.com,
        olson@...ulusnetworks.com, leedom@...lsio.com, kubakici@...pl,
        galp@...lanox.com, andrew@...n.ch, manojmalviya@...lsio.com,
        santosh@...lsio.com, yuval.mintz@...gic.com, odedw@...lanox.com,
        ariela@...lanox.com, jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/3] ethtool: support for forward error
 correction mode setting on a link

From: Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2017 16:47:25 -0700

> From: Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>
> 
> Forward Error Correction (FEC) modes i.e Base-R
> and Reed-Solomon modes are introduced in 25G/40G/100G standards
> for providing good BER at high speeds. Various networking devices
> which support 25G/40G/100G provides ability to manage supported FEC
> modes and the lack of FEC encoding control and reporting today is a
> source for interoperability issues for many vendors.
> FEC capability as well as specific FEC mode i.e. Base-R
> or RS modes can be requested or advertised through bits D44:47 of base link
> codeword.
> 
> This patch set intends to provide option under ethtool to manage and
> report FEC encoding settings for networking devices as per IEEE 802.3
> bj, bm and by specs.
> 
> v2 :
>         - minor patch format fixes and typos pointed out by Andrew
>         - there was a pending discussion on the use of 'auto' vs
>           'automatic' for fec settings. I have left it as 'auto'
>           because in most cases today auto is used in place of
>           automatic to represent automatically generated values.
>           We use it in other networking config too. I would prefer
>           leaving it as auto.

Series applied to net-next, thank you.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ