netdev - [patch net-next 5/6] mlxsw: spectrum_router: Refresh offload indication upon group refresh

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed,  2 Aug 2017 09:56:05 +0200
From:   Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     davem@...emloft.net, idosch@...lanox.com, mlxsw@...lanox.com,
        dsahern@...il.com, roopa@...ulusnetworks.com,
        nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com, hannes@...essinduktion.org,
        yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org, kuznet@....inr.ac.ru
Subject: [patch net-next 5/6] mlxsw: spectrum_router: Refresh offload indication upon group refresh

From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...lanox.com>

Now that we provide offload indication using the nexthop's flags we must
refresh the offload indication whenever the offload state within the
group changes.

This didn't matter until now, as offload indication was provided using
the FIB info flags and multipath routes were marked as offloaded as long
as one of the nexthops was offloaded.

Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...lanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>
---
 .../net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_router.c  | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_router.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_router.c
index 40aecbc..2f03c7e 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_router.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_router.c
@@ -1653,6 +1653,24 @@ mlxsw_sp_nexthop_fib_entries_update(struct mlxsw_sp *mlxsw_sp,
 }
 
 static void
+mlxsw_sp_fib_entry_offload_refresh(struct mlxsw_sp_fib_entry *fib_entry,
+				   enum mlxsw_reg_ralue_op op, int err);
+
+static void
+mlxsw_sp_nexthop_fib_entries_refresh(struct mlxsw_sp_nexthop_group *nh_grp)
+{
+	enum mlxsw_reg_ralue_op op = MLXSW_REG_RALUE_OP_WRITE_WRITE;
+	struct mlxsw_sp_fib_entry *fib_entry;
+
+	list_for_each_entry(fib_entry, &nh_grp->fib_list, nexthop_group_node) {
+		if (!mlxsw_sp_fib_node_entry_is_first(fib_entry->fib_node,
+						      fib_entry))
+			continue;
+		mlxsw_sp_fib_entry_offload_refresh(fib_entry, op, 0);
+	}
+}
+
+static void
 mlxsw_sp_nexthop_group_refresh(struct mlxsw_sp *mlxsw_sp,
 			       struct mlxsw_sp_nexthop_group *nh_grp)
 {
@@ -1739,6 +1757,10 @@ mlxsw_sp_nexthop_group_refresh(struct mlxsw_sp *mlxsw_sp,
 		dev_warn(mlxsw_sp->bus_info->dev, "Failed to mass-update adjacency index for nexthop group.\n");
 		goto set_trap;
 	}
+
+	/* Offload state within the group changed, so update the flags. */
+	mlxsw_sp_nexthop_fib_entries_refresh(nh_grp);
+
 	return;
 
 set_trap:
-- 
2.9.3