netdev - Re: XFRM pcpu cache issue

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 4 Aug 2017 18:55:43 +0200
From:   Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
To:     Ilan Tayari <ilant@...lanox.com>
Cc:     Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
        Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Yevgeny Kliteynik <kliteyn@...lanox.com>,
        Yossi Kuperman <yossiku@...lanox.com>,
        Boris Pismenny <borisp@...lanox.com>,
        Yossef Efraim <yossefe@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: XFRM pcpu cache issue

Ilan Tayari <ilant@...lanox.com> wrote:
> I debugged a little the regression I told you about the other day...
> 
> Steps and Symptoms:
> 1. Set up a host-to-host IPSec tunnel (or transport, doesn't matter)
> 2. Ping over IPSec, or do something to populate the pcpu cache
> 3. Join a MC group, then leave MC group
> 4. Try to ping again using same CPU as before -> traffic doesn't egress the machine at all
> 
> If trying from another CPU (with clean cache), it pings well.
> If clearing the pcpu cache, it works well again.

Yes, I think i see the problem, thanks for debugging this.

I dropped the stale_bundle() check vs. rfc, that was a stupid thing
to do because that is what would detect this....


Does this help?

diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
@@ -1818,7 +1818,8 @@ xfrm_resolve_and_create_bundle(struct xfrm_policy **pols, int num_pols,
 	    xdst->num_pols == num_pols &&
 	    !xfrm_pol_dead(xdst) &&
 	    memcmp(xdst->pols, pols,
-		   sizeof(struct xfrm_policy *) * num_pols) == 0) {
+		   sizeof(struct xfrm_policy *) * num_pols) == 0 &&
+	    xfrm_bundle_ok(xdst)) {
 		dst_hold(&xdst->u.dst);
 		return xdst;
 	}