netdev - [PATCH net-next] liquidio: fix wrong info about vf rx/tx ring parameters reported to ethtool

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 7 Aug 2017 10:39:00 -0700
From:   Felix Manlunas <felix.manlunas@...ium.com>
To:     davem@...emloft.net
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, raghu.vatsavayi@...ium.com,
        derek.chickles@...ium.com, satananda.burla@...ium.com,
        intiyaz.basha@...ium.com
Subject: [PATCH net-next] liquidio: fix wrong info about vf rx/tx ring
 parameters reported to ethtool

From: Intiyaz Basha <intiyaz.basha@...ium.com>

Information reported to ethtool about vf rx/tx ring parameters is wrong.
Fix it by adding the missing initializations.

Signed-off-by: Intiyaz Basha <intiyaz.basha@...ium.com>
Signed-off-by: Felix Manlunas <felix.manlunas@...ium.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/cavium/liquidio/lio_ethtool.c | 30 +++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/cavium/liquidio/lio_ethtool.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/cavium/liquidio/lio_ethtool.c
index 09e2875..b78e296 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/cavium/liquidio/lio_ethtool.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/cavium/liquidio/lio_ethtool.c
@@ -649,33 +649,21 @@ lio_ethtool_get_ringparam(struct net_device *netdev,
 		rx_max_pending = CN6XXX_MAX_OQ_DESCRIPTORS;
 		rx_pending = CFG_GET_NUM_RX_DESCS_NIC_IF(conf6x, lio->ifidx);
 		tx_pending = CFG_GET_NUM_TX_DESCS_NIC_IF(conf6x, lio->ifidx);
-	} else if (OCTEON_CN23XX_PF(oct)) {
-		struct octeon_config *conf23 = CHIP_CONF(oct, cn23xx_pf);
-
+	} else if (OCTEON_CN23XX_PF(oct) || OCTEON_CN23XX_VF(oct)) {
 		tx_max_pending = CN23XX_MAX_IQ_DESCRIPTORS;
 		rx_max_pending = CN23XX_MAX_OQ_DESCRIPTORS;
-		rx_pending = CFG_GET_NUM_RX_DESCS_NIC_IF(conf23, lio->ifidx);
-		tx_pending = CFG_GET_NUM_TX_DESCS_NIC_IF(conf23, lio->ifidx);
-	}
-
-	if (lio->mtu > OCTNET_DEFAULT_FRM_SIZE - OCTNET_FRM_HEADER_SIZE) {
-		ering->rx_pending = 0;
-		ering->rx_max_pending = 0;
-		ering->rx_mini_pending = 0;
-		ering->rx_jumbo_pending = rx_pending;
-		ering->rx_mini_max_pending = 0;
-		ering->rx_jumbo_max_pending = rx_max_pending;
-	} else {
-		ering->rx_pending = rx_pending;
-		ering->rx_max_pending = rx_max_pending;
-		ering->rx_mini_pending = 0;
-		ering->rx_jumbo_pending = 0;
-		ering->rx_mini_max_pending = 0;
-		ering->rx_jumbo_max_pending = 0;
+		rx_pending = oct->droq[0]->max_count;
+		tx_pending = oct->instr_queue[0]->max_count;
 	}
 
 	ering->tx_pending = tx_pending;
 	ering->tx_max_pending = tx_max_pending;
+	ering->rx_pending = rx_pending;
+	ering->rx_max_pending = rx_max_pending;
+	ering->rx_mini_pending = 0;
+	ering->rx_jumbo_pending = 0;
+	ering->rx_mini_max_pending = 0;
+	ering->rx_jumbo_max_pending = 0;
 }
 
 static u32 lio_get_msglevel(struct net_device *netdev)