lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 23 Aug 2017 10:38:50 +0530
From:   Akshat Kakkar <akshat.1984@...il.com>
To:     Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>
Cc:     Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
        David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Something hitting my total number of connections to the server

On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 5:58 PM, Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 1:42 AM, Akshat Kakkar <akshat.1984@...il.com> wrote:
>> There are multiple hosts/clients. All are mainly windows based.
>>
>> Timestamp is not used as my clients mainly are windows based and in
>> that it tcp timestamp is by defauly disabled.
> ...
>> net.ipv4.tcp_tw_reuse=1
>> net.ipv4.tcp_tw_recycle=1
>
> I suspect the problem is there. The net.ipv4.tcp_tw_recycle setting
> should be 0. Running with the value 1 is known to cause buggy behavior
> related to TCP timestamps, and that feature has been removed in kernel
> v4.12.
>
> Can you please re-run your tests with net.ipv4.tcp_tw_recycle=0 or a
> newer kernel?
>
> neal

Thanks for your reply.

I understand that.

But my point is, though tcp timestamp is enabled on the server, but as
client is not using it ... so how come this _bug_ (if any) is
triggered in first place.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ