netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] selftests/bpf: check the instruction dumps are populated

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 26 Aug 2017 03:16:06 +0200
From:   Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org
CC:     kafai@...com, oss-drivers@...ronome.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] selftests/bpf: check the instruction dumps are
 populated

On 08/25/2017 11:39 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> Add a basic test for checking whether kernel is populating
> the jited and xlated BPF images.  It was used to confirm
> the behaviour change from commit d777b2ddbecf ("bpf: don't
> zero out the info struct in bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd()"),
> which made bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd() usable for retrieving
> the image dumps.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
[...]
> @@ -328,15 +331,20 @@ static void test_bpf_obj_id(void)
>   			  prog_infos[i].type != BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKET_FILTER ||
>   			  info_len != sizeof(struct bpf_prog_info) ||
>   			  (jit_enabled && !prog_infos[i].jited_prog_len) ||
> -			  !prog_infos[i].xlated_prog_len,
> +			  (jit_enabled &&
> +			   !memcmp(jited_insns, zeros, sizeof(zeros))) ||
> +			  !prog_infos[i].xlated_prog_len ||
> +			  !memcmp(xlated_insns, zeros, sizeof(zeros)),

There could still be the case where a JIT could bail out
for some reason and punt to the interpreter instead, but
I'm fine assuming for the specific test cases we have it
has to succeed, and if not JIT misses features or has other
issues. ;) Thus:

Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>

Thanks!