lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 4 Oct 2017 22:27:49 +0200
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     Richard Siegfried <richard_siegfried@...temli.org>
Cc:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/3] A own subdirectory for shared TCP code

On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 08:54:17PM +0200, Richard Siegfried wrote:
> On 04/10/17 01:03, David Miller wrote:
> > As someone who has to do backports regularly to -stable, there is no way
> > I am applying this.
> > 
> > Sorry.
> Okay, I see.
> 
> Is grouping files into subdirectories something generally
> unwanted/unlikely to be applied or is this specific to TCP / networking?
> 
> Because there are several other places in the source tree where I would
> like to group things.

Hi Richard

It is generally unwanted.

Have you tried back porting patches when the directory structure has
changed? Files have moved around? It makes it a lot harder to
do. Meaning patches are going to be back ported less often. Fixes
which could be security relevant might not get back ported, etc.

Kernel 4.4 is going to be supported until 2022. So moving files around
is going to make Greg Kroah-Hartman life more difficult for the next 5
years.

	Andrew

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ