netdev - [PATCH net-next 1/1] [net] bonding: Add NUMA notice

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu,  5 Oct 2017 16:23:45 -0400
From:   Patrick Talbert <ptalbert@...hat.com>
To:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Patrick Talbert <ptalbert@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 1/1] [net] bonding: Add NUMA notice

Network performance can suffer when a load balancing bond uses slave
interfaces which are in different NUMA domains.

This compares the NUMA domain of a newly enslaved interface against any
existing enslaved interfaces and prints a warning if they do not match.

Signed-off-by: Patrick Talbert <ptalbert@...hat.com>
---
:100644 100644 b19dc03... 250a969... M	drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
 drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
index b19dc03..250a969 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
@@ -55,6 +55,7 @@
 #include <asm/dma.h>
 #include <linux/uaccess.h>
 #include <linux/errno.h>
+#include <linux/device.h>
 #include <linux/netdevice.h>
 #include <linux/inetdevice.h>
 #include <linux/igmp.h>
@@ -1450,6 +1451,21 @@ int bond_enslave(struct net_device *bond_dev, struct net_device *slave_dev)
 		}
 	}
 
+	if (bond_has_slaves(bond)) {
+		struct list_head *iter;
+		struct slave *slave;
+
+		bond_for_each_slave(bond, slave, iter) {
+			if (slave_dev->dev.numa_node !=
+			    slave->dev->dev.numa_node) {
+				netdev_warn(bond_dev,
+					    "%s does not match NUMA domain of existing slaves. This could have a performance impact.",
+					    slave_dev->name);
+				break;
+			}
+		}
+	}
+
 	call_netdevice_notifiers(NETDEV_JOIN, slave_dev);
 
 	/* If this is the first slave, then we need to set the master's hardware
-- 
1.8.3.1