lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 06 Oct 2017 16:49:55 -0700
From:   Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:     Wei Wang <weiwan@...gle.com>
Cc:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 00/16] ipv6: replace rwlock with rcu and
 spinlock in fib6 table

On Fri, 2017-10-06 at 12:05 -0700, Wei Wang wrote:
> From: Wei Wang <weiwan@...gle.com>
> 
> Currently, fib6 table is protected by rwlock. During route lookup,
> reader lock is taken and during route insertion, deletion or
> modification, writer lock is taken. This is a very inefficient
> implementation because the fastpath always has to do the operation
> to grab the reader lock.
> According to my latest syn flood test on an iota ivybridage machine
> with 2 10G mlx nics bonded together, each with 8 rx queues on 2 NUMA
> nodes, and with the upstream net-next kernel:
> ipv4 stack can handle around 4.2Mpps
> ipv6 stack can handle around 1.3Mpps
> 
> In order to close the gap of the performance number between ipv4
> and ipv6 stack, this patch series tries to get rid of the usage of
> the rwlock and replace it with rcu and spinlock protection. This will
> greatly speed up the fastpath performance as it only needs to hold
> rcu which is much less expensive than grabbing the reader lock. It
> also makes ipv6 fib implementation more consistent with ipv4.
> 
> In order to be able to replace the current rwlock with rcu and
> spinlock, some preparation work is needed:
> Patch 1-8 introduces a per-route hash table (protected by rcu and a
> different spinlock) to store all cached routes created by pmtu and ip
> redirect under its main route. This makes the main fib6 tree only
> contain static routes.
> Patch 9-14 prepares all the reader path to be ready to tolerate
> concurrent writer.
> Patch 15 finally does the rwlock to rcu and spinlock conversion.
> Patch 16 takes care of rt6_stats.
> 
> After this patch series, in the same syn flood test,
> ipv6 stack can now handle around 3.5Mpps compared to previous 1.3Mpps
> in my test setup.
> 
> After this patch series, there are still some improvements that should
> be done in ipv6 stack:
> 1. During route lookup, dst_use() is called everytime on the selected
> route to update dst->__use and dst->lastuse. This dirties the cacheline 
> and causes extra cacheline miss and should be avoided.
> 2. when no route is found in the current table, net->ip6.ipv6_null_entry
> is used and refcnt is taken on it. As there is no pcpu cache for this
> specific route, frequent change on the refcnt for this route causes
> quite some cacheline misses.
> And to make things worse, if CONFIG_IPV6_MULTIPLE_TABLES is defined,
> output path route lookup always starts with local table first and
> guarantees to hit net->ipv6.ip6_null_entry before continuing to do
> lookup in the main table.
> These operations on net->ipv6.ip6_null_entry could potentially be
> avoided.
> 3. ipv6 input path route lookup grabs refcnt on dst. This is different
> from ipv4. We could potentially change this behavior to let ipv6 input
> path route lookup not to grab refcnt on dst. However, it does not give
> us much performance boost as we currently have pcpu route cache for
> input path as well in ipv6. But this work probably is still worth doing
> to unify ipv6 and ipv4 route lookup behavior.
> 
> The above issues will be addressed separately after this patch series
> has been accepted.
> 
> This is a joint work with Martin KaFai Lau and Eric Dumazet. And many
> many thanks to them for their inspiring ideas and big big code review
> efforts.
> 
> Wei Wang (16):
>   ipv6: introduce a new function fib6_update_sernum()
>   ipv6: introduce a hash table to store dst cache
>   ipv6: prepare fib6_remove_prefsrc() for exception table
>   ipv6: prepare rt6_mtu_change() for exception table
>   ipv6: prepare rt6_clean_tohost() for exception table
>   ipv6: prepare fib6_age() for exception table
>   ipv6: prepare fib6_locate() for exception table
>   ipv6: hook up exception table to store dst cache
>   ipv6: grab rt->rt6i_ref before allocating pcpu rt
>   ipv6: don't release rt->rt6i_pcpu memory during rt6_release()
>   ipv6: replace dst_hold() with dst_hold_safe() in routing code
>   ipv6: update fn_sernum after route is inserted to tree
>   ipv6: check fn->leaf before it is used
>   ipv6: add key length check into rt6_select()
>   ipv6: replace rwlock with rcu and spinlock in fib6_table
>   ipv6: take care of rt6_stats
> 
>  include/net/dst.h       |   2 +-
>  include/net/ip6_fib.h   |  79 ++++-
>  include/net/ip6_route.h |   5 +
>  net/ipv6/addrconf.c     |  17 +-
>  net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c      | 645 ++++++++++++++++++----------------
>  net/ipv6/route.c        | 901 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>  6 files changed, 1179 insertions(+), 470 deletions(-)
> 

Awesome work Wei.

For the whole series :

Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>

Thanks !


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ