[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 10:44:53 -0700
From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Cc: Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>, matanb@...lanox.com,
leonro@...lanox.com, mlxsw@...lanox.com
Subject: Re: [patch net-next 1/4] net: sched: make tc_action_ops->get_dev
return dev and avoid passing net
On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 12:30 AM, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us> wrote:
> -static int tcf_mirred_device(const struct tc_action *a, struct net *net,
> - struct net_device **mirred_dev)
> +static struct net_device *tcf_mirred_get_dev(const struct tc_action *a)
> {
> - int ifindex = tcf_mirred_ifindex(a);
> + struct tcf_mirred *m = to_mirred(a);
>
> - *mirred_dev = __dev_get_by_index(net, ifindex);
> - if (!*mirred_dev)
> - return -EINVAL;
> - return 0;
> + return __dev_get_by_index(m->net, m->tcfm_ifindex);
Hmm, why not just return m->tcfm_dev?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists