netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] net: defer cgroups init to accept()

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 09 Oct 2017 20:55:27 -0700 (PDT)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     edumazet@...gle.com
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@...il.com, hannes@...xchg.org,
        tj@...nel.org, jsperbeck@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] net: defer cgroups init to accept()

From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2017 21:47:49 -0700

> On Sun, Oct 8, 2017 at 9:44 PM, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com> wrote:
>> After TCP 3WHS became lockless, we should not attempt cgroup games
>> from sk_clone_lock() since listener/cgroup might be already gone.
>>
>> Move this business to inet_csk_accept() where we have
>> the guarantee both parent and child exist.
>>
>> Many thanks to John Sperbeck for spotting these issues
>>
>> Eric Dumazet (2):
>>   net: memcontrol: defer call to mem_cgroup_sk_alloc()
>>   net: defer call to cgroup_sk_alloc()
> 
> This was based on net tree, but I used the wrong script, and thus this
> has the [PATCH net-next] tag.
> 
> Sorry for the confusion, but I guess this also can be applied to
> net-next since this is not a recent regression.

Series applied to 'net', thanks.