lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 13 Oct 2017 10:12:38 +0800
From:   Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@...wei.com>
To:     Yuval Mintz <yuvalm@...lanox.com>,
        "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:     "huangdaode@...ilicon.com" <huangdaode@...ilicon.com>,
        "xuwei5@...ilicon.com" <xuwei5@...ilicon.com>,
        "liguozhu@...ilicon.com" <liguozhu@...ilicon.com>,
        "Yisen.Zhuang@...wei.com" <Yisen.Zhuang@...wei.com>,
        "gabriele.paoloni@...wei.com" <gabriele.paoloni@...wei.com>,
        "john.garry@...wei.com" <john.garry@...wei.com>,
        "linuxarm@...wei.com" <linuxarm@...wei.com>,
        "salil.mehta@...wei.com" <salil.mehta@...wei.com>,
        "lipeng321@...wei.com" <lipeng321@...wei.com>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] mqprio: Add a new hardware offload type in
 mqprio

Hi, Yuval

On 2017/10/13 4:10, Yuval Mintz wrote:
>> When a driver supports both dcb and hardware offloaded mqprio, and
>> user is running mqprio and dcb tool concurrently, the configuration
>> set by each tool may be conflicted with each other because the dcb
> (for second 'each') s/each/the
> 

Will do, Thanks

>> and mqprio may be using the same hardwere offload component and share
> s/hardwere/hardware

Will do, Thanks

> 
>> the tc system in the network stack.
>>
>> This patch adds a new offload type to indicate that the underlying
>> driver offload prio mapping as part of DCB. If the driver would be
> 'should' offload

Will do, Thanks

> 
>> incapable of that it would refuse the offload. User would then have
>> to explicitly request that qdisc offload.
> 
> 
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux - Powered by OpenVZ