netdev - Re: [PATCH] netlink: use NETLINK_CB(in_skb).sk instead of looking it up

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 18 Oct 2017 12:21:24 +0100 (WEST)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     johannes@...solutions.net
Cc:     linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        ebiederman@...tter.com, johannes.berg@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netlink: use NETLINK_CB(in_skb).sk instead of looking
 it up

From: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2017 16:57:49 +0200

> From: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>
> 
> When netlink_ack() reports an allocation error to the sending
> socket, there's no need to look up the sending socket since
> it's available in the SKB's CB. Use that instead of going to
> the trouble of looking it up.
> 
> Note that the pointer is only available since Eric Biederman's
> commit 3fbc290540a1 ("netlink: Make the sending netlink socket availabe in NETLINK_CB")
> which is far newer than the original lookup code (Oct 2003)
> (though the field was called 'ssk' in that commit and only got
> renamed to 'sk' later, I'd actually argue 'ssk' was better - or
> perhaps it should've been 'source_sk' - since there are so many
> different 'sk's involved.)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>

Applied to net-next.