lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 19 Oct 2017 14:48:37 +0300
From:   Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...lanox.com>
To:     Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Cc:     Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...lanox.com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Eric W . Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
        Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
        Majd Dibbiny <majd@...lanox.com>,
        Yonatan Cohen <yonatanc@...lanox.com>,
        Eran Ben Elisha <eranbe@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 0/7] net: speedup netns create/delete time



On 26/09/2017 6:30 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 8:22 AM, Dmitry Torokhov
> <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com> wrote:
> 
>> It is in Greg's tree where all kobject patches should go through as far as I know.
> 
> Yes, I will fix this, adding a second memmove()
> 
Hi Eric,

I just wanted to check if this is solved already, as I don't want to 
keep an unnecessary revert patch in our internal branches.
According to my check bug still exists.

Thanks,
Tariq

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ